A multimillion-dollar fight over who controls the message on a concert stage is now heading straight into a First Amendment argument. Kid Cudi has asked a California federal judge to toss M.I.A.’s $2.8 million lawsuit, arguing that removing her from his Rebel Ragers Tour was protected expression and part of his right to decide who appears on his show. His attorneys filed an anti-SLAPP motion in the case, which U.S. District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett is handling.
M.I.A. sued after Cudi dropped her from the tour following a Dallas performance in May. During the set, she made remarks about immigration and being “canceled” for identifying as a Republican voter, drawing boos from parts of the crowd. Cudi later said he would not keep someone on his tour after comments he considered offensive to fans. M.I.A. responded by accusing him of interfering with a Live Nation agreement that she says guaranteed her $2.805 million for the run.
Read More: This Isn't The First Time OutKast Sued Over A Name
Kid Cudi Says Choosing His Openers Is Protected Speech
Cudi’s argument is not simply that he had a good reason to remove her. His attorney, Mathew Rosengart, is asking the court to treat the decision itself as protected artistic control. The motion leans on a 2019 California appellate case involving Eddie Money, where the court found that choosing musicians for a live performance could qualify as First Amendment activity. Under California’s anti-SLAPP law, M.I.A. would then have to show that her claims are likely to succeed before the case moves forward.
M.I.A.’s complaint takes the opposite view. She alleges that her agreement gave her broad creative control over her performances and claims Cudi knew exactly who he was hiring before the tour began. The lawsuit accuses him of inducing Live Nation to breach the deal, costing her the guaranteed fee along with money tied to merchandise and VIP packages. She also alleges that a separate private-party opportunity worth roughly $290,000 fell apart afterward. Live Nation is not named as a defendant.
Judge Garnett’s ruling will determine whether M.I.A.’s claims survive long enough to move into discovery. If Cudi wins the anti-SLAPP fight, the $2.8 million case could end before either side gets much deeper into the contractual dispute.
Read More: Kid Cudi Fires Back At M.I.A. Lawsuit By Invoking First Amendment
