Drake Drops $1 Million On 100-Carat Diamond Heart Chain: Report

Just a little somethin'-somethin'.

BYErika Marie
Link Copied to Clipboard!
14.0K Views
Frazer Harrison / Staff / Getty Images

We can only imagine what Drake's jewelry collection looks like, let alone the room he houses it all in. We recently reported on the matching eagle and owl head chains that Drake and Future purchased—bling that reportedly set them back $400K. It's believed that the "Life is Good" collaborators were hinting at their joint single, but it may also mean What a Time to Be Alive 2 may be arriving sooner than later. 

https://www.instagram.com/p/B6bjl2_g5Kn

It's not uncommon for rappers to drop a few stacks on some new ice, but Drake has been outdoing himself lately. Back in November, it was revealed that the OVO mogul reportedly spent $500K on a massive 22-carat, platinum-plated diamond ring from Gemma Fine Jewelry. Keeping with the heart theme, TMZ shared on Friday morning that Drake copped himself yet another chain, but according to the outlet, he spent over $1 million on this one.

TMZ stated that Gemma Fine Jewelry was responsible for this piece, as well. It's said to be 100 carats and features a series of heart-shaped pendants all around. Check out the video of Drake's shiny new necklace below and let us know if you'd drop $1 million on a chain if you had the chance.


  • Link Copied to Clipboard!
About The Author
Erika Marie is a seasoned journalist, editor, and ghostwriter who works predominantly in the fields of music, spirituality, mental health advocacy, and social activism. The Los Angeles editor, storyteller, and activist has been involved in the behind-the-scenes workings of the entertainment industry for nearly two decades. E.M. attempts to write stories that are compelling while remaining informative and respectful. She's an advocate of lyrical witticism & the power of the pen. Favorites: Motown, New Jack Swing, '90s R&B, Hip Hop, Indie Rock, & Punk; Funk, Soul, Harlem Renaissance Jazz greats, and artists who innovate, not simply replicate.